Sunday, February 28, 2010
Here she goes again
Pelosi is nuts to a fault. She insists that "we don't have time to start over" when talking about the healthcare debaucle. If it is not going into effect for several years.........YES WE HAVE TIME TO START OVER! What a moron! What we don't have is the money to pay for this stupid bill! Pelosi! How is it you can walk and talk at the same time, but you just don't get it. We don't want this bill. It cost too much and does too little. You simply can't be that stupid!
Healthcare mess
By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
February 26, 2010
"There have been a lot of comments from every Republican about the polls," President Obama said near the end of the mind-numbing White House summit on health care reform. "What's interesting is when you poll people about the individual elements in each of these bills, they're all for them."
What Obama was addressing was a dilemma that drives Democrats crazy. Polls show the public supports some parts of the Democratic national health care reform plan, but adamantly opposes the comprehensive bill now dying a slow death on Capitol Hill.
Just look at the latest survey from CNN and Opinion Research. When asked if they support "preventing health insurance companies from dropping coverage for people who become seriously ill," 62 percent say yes. When asked whether they support "requiring all large and midsized businesses to provide health insurance for their employees," 72 percent say yes. And when asked if they support "preventing health insurance companies from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions," 58 percent say yes.
On the other hand, asked what Congress should do on health care -- pass the current bill, start work on an entirely new bill, or stop working on the issue altogether -- a huge majority opposes the Democratic proposal now on the table. Just 25 percent of those surveyed want to see the bill passed. Forty-eight percent want Congress to start over, and 25 percent want lawmakers to stop working on health care altogether. Put those last two together, and an overwhelming majority of 73 percent do not want Congress to pass the current bill.
The White House is cherry-picking the news it likes; that's what Obama was doing when he said the public is "all for" elements of the bill. But bring up the polls showing people just don't want the current bill, and the administration gets a little dodgy.
"Who knows what is in those polls, how they were taken, when they were taken?" White House health care spokeswoman Linda Douglass told Fox News during a break in the summit.
But why do people support some elements of the bill while opposing the bill overall? Some Democrats blame Republican misinformation. Some believe it's because the bill isn't yet a reality, and people would love it, if it were only passed. Others say the public is just stupid.
Few Democrats can accept the possibility that voters are telling them their whole approach is wrong. Big, comprehensive legislative proposals just make people nervous.
"We don't do comprehensive well," Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander said at the health summit. "We've watched the comprehensive, economywide, cap and trade. We've watched the comprehensive immigration bill ... we've watched the comprehensive health care bill. And they fall of their own weight."
That's what's happening now. And it's something Democrats would know, if they had listened to one of their leading pollsters.
Back during the 2004 presidential race, there was a debate going on inside the John Kerry campaign. Should the Democratic candidate push bold, far-reaching proposals, or should he balance boldness with more modest initiatives?
Pollster Stanley Greenberg did some research. He found that, when considered individually, Kerry's most sweeping plans were more popular with voters than his more modest ones. "Voters are ready to respond to new ideas, particularly bold ones," Greenberg wrote.
To further test the idea, Greenberg put together a hypothetical Kerry agenda -- he called it "Bold Kerry" -- which included all of the candidate's bold ideas.
Voters balked. They were uneasy with the big agenda, even though they liked some elements of it. "While voters are clearly open to bold initiatives to major problems, they may be less attracted to the candidate who wants to act boldly in every area, without exception," Greenberg concluded. "All together, that may have suggested an expanding scope for government beyond what people felt they could trust."
And that is what is happening now with health care. Ever since Inauguration Day, the White House has acted on the assumption that, because voters elected Barack Obama, they want "Bold Obama." All the evidence suggests that is wrong.
At the end of the summit, Obama said that if he can't reach an agreement with Republicans -- and there's no chance if the existing bill stays on the table -- then "we've got to go ahead and make some decisions." That means jamming the bill through Congress against the public's wishes. And if there's still dispute, Obama said, "that's what elections are for."
He's right. This is an issue that won't be fully settled until November.
Byron York, The Examiner's chief political correspondent, can be contacted at byork@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears on Tuesday and Friday, and his stories and blog posts appears on www.ExaminerPolitics.com ExaminerPolitics.com.
Tags:
Chief Political Correspondent
February 26, 2010
"There have been a lot of comments from every Republican about the polls," President Obama said near the end of the mind-numbing White House summit on health care reform. "What's interesting is when you poll people about the individual elements in each of these bills, they're all for them."
What Obama was addressing was a dilemma that drives Democrats crazy. Polls show the public supports some parts of the Democratic national health care reform plan, but adamantly opposes the comprehensive bill now dying a slow death on Capitol Hill.
Just look at the latest survey from CNN and Opinion Research. When asked if they support "preventing health insurance companies from dropping coverage for people who become seriously ill," 62 percent say yes. When asked whether they support "requiring all large and midsized businesses to provide health insurance for their employees," 72 percent say yes. And when asked if they support "preventing health insurance companies from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions," 58 percent say yes.
On the other hand, asked what Congress should do on health care -- pass the current bill, start work on an entirely new bill, or stop working on the issue altogether -- a huge majority opposes the Democratic proposal now on the table. Just 25 percent of those surveyed want to see the bill passed. Forty-eight percent want Congress to start over, and 25 percent want lawmakers to stop working on health care altogether. Put those last two together, and an overwhelming majority of 73 percent do not want Congress to pass the current bill.
The White House is cherry-picking the news it likes; that's what Obama was doing when he said the public is "all for" elements of the bill. But bring up the polls showing people just don't want the current bill, and the administration gets a little dodgy.
"Who knows what is in those polls, how they were taken, when they were taken?" White House health care spokeswoman Linda Douglass told Fox News during a break in the summit.
But why do people support some elements of the bill while opposing the bill overall? Some Democrats blame Republican misinformation. Some believe it's because the bill isn't yet a reality, and people would love it, if it were only passed. Others say the public is just stupid.
Few Democrats can accept the possibility that voters are telling them their whole approach is wrong. Big, comprehensive legislative proposals just make people nervous.
"We don't do comprehensive well," Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander said at the health summit. "We've watched the comprehensive, economywide, cap and trade. We've watched the comprehensive immigration bill ... we've watched the comprehensive health care bill. And they fall of their own weight."
That's what's happening now. And it's something Democrats would know, if they had listened to one of their leading pollsters.
Back during the 2004 presidential race, there was a debate going on inside the John Kerry campaign. Should the Democratic candidate push bold, far-reaching proposals, or should he balance boldness with more modest initiatives?
Pollster Stanley Greenberg did some research. He found that, when considered individually, Kerry's most sweeping plans were more popular with voters than his more modest ones. "Voters are ready to respond to new ideas, particularly bold ones," Greenberg wrote.
To further test the idea, Greenberg put together a hypothetical Kerry agenda -- he called it "Bold Kerry" -- which included all of the candidate's bold ideas.
Voters balked. They were uneasy with the big agenda, even though they liked some elements of it. "While voters are clearly open to bold initiatives to major problems, they may be less attracted to the candidate who wants to act boldly in every area, without exception," Greenberg concluded. "All together, that may have suggested an expanding scope for government beyond what people felt they could trust."
And that is what is happening now with health care. Ever since Inauguration Day, the White House has acted on the assumption that, because voters elected Barack Obama, they want "Bold Obama." All the evidence suggests that is wrong.
At the end of the summit, Obama said that if he can't reach an agreement with Republicans -- and there's no chance if the existing bill stays on the table -- then "we've got to go ahead and make some decisions." That means jamming the bill through Congress against the public's wishes. And if there's still dispute, Obama said, "that's what elections are for."
He's right. This is an issue that won't be fully settled until November.
Byron York, The Examiner's chief political correspondent, can be contacted at byork@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears on Tuesday and Friday, and his stories and blog posts appears on www.ExaminerPolitics.com ExaminerPolitics.com.
Tags:
Saturday, February 27, 2010
The Sham Wow Summit
Posted by Erick Erickson (Profile)
Thursday, February 25th at 10:56PM EST
41 Comments
There are many reasons the Republican Party is often referred to as the Stupid Party. Many Republicans thought that after the President overshadowed the GOP at their Baltimore retreat last month, going to Blair House yesterday would just be another PR disaster.
It was anything but.
The GOP won the day so convincingly that even the traditional media had to praise the party for talking issues.
Contrast that with Barack Obama who scowled, berated, lied, and harassed the attendees — not to mention filibustered them.
In the most ironic moment of the day, Barack Obama lectured Virginia Congressman Eric Cantor on having the Democrats’ 2,700+ page health care bill on his desk at the meeting. Obama called it a “prop.” At the same time, Democrats were in the newspapers admitting that, in effect, Barack Obama was using the GOP as a prop in a vain effort to show bipartisanship on health care.
There is bipartisanship on health care. There is bipartisan opposition to it. The Democrats must realize today that they would get nothing out of the meeting. They will now try to force health care deform through Congress on a majority vote in each house.
Only a couple of years ago, Barack Obama praised the filibuster claiming it was what the founding fathers wanted to prevent the tyranny of the majority. Now he is intent on ignoring the filibuster and ramming through health care deform.
If nothing else, today shows the American public that the Republicans have a better agenda, better ideas, and are willing to stand up and oppose a reckless scheme that will increase health care costs.
Thursday, February 25th at 10:56PM EST
41 Comments
There are many reasons the Republican Party is often referred to as the Stupid Party. Many Republicans thought that after the President overshadowed the GOP at their Baltimore retreat last month, going to Blair House yesterday would just be another PR disaster.
It was anything but.
The GOP won the day so convincingly that even the traditional media had to praise the party for talking issues.
Contrast that with Barack Obama who scowled, berated, lied, and harassed the attendees — not to mention filibustered them.
In the most ironic moment of the day, Barack Obama lectured Virginia Congressman Eric Cantor on having the Democrats’ 2,700+ page health care bill on his desk at the meeting. Obama called it a “prop.” At the same time, Democrats were in the newspapers admitting that, in effect, Barack Obama was using the GOP as a prop in a vain effort to show bipartisanship on health care.
There is bipartisanship on health care. There is bipartisan opposition to it. The Democrats must realize today that they would get nothing out of the meeting. They will now try to force health care deform through Congress on a majority vote in each house.
Only a couple of years ago, Barack Obama praised the filibuster claiming it was what the founding fathers wanted to prevent the tyranny of the majority. Now he is intent on ignoring the filibuster and ramming through health care deform.
If nothing else, today shows the American public that the Republicans have a better agenda, better ideas, and are willing to stand up and oppose a reckless scheme that will increase health care costs.
Chile earthquake
Overnight an 8.8 earthquake hit Concepcion, Chile.Expect before the day is over that Obama spokesman, Robert Gibbs will have a press conference in order to discuss how Geoge Bush is responsible.
Our thoughts and prayers go out to the people of Chile. Know one thing for sure.....you will get help from America. We are always coming to the rescue to suffering people around the world.
Our thoughts and prayers go out to the people of Chile. Know one thing for sure.....you will get help from America. We are always coming to the rescue to suffering people around the world.
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Attention America
VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT
AP- WASHINGTON D.C. - In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency,the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has Released copies
of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental College . Released
today, the transcript school indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro,
received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate.
The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court
order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California.
The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify,
for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.
This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record
of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news
has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt
about Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as President article titled,
"Obama Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may
overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U.K. In a
related matter, under growing pressure from several groups,
Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo
Donofrio of New Jersey . This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship
disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio's case is just one of 18
suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship or
qualification to serve as president.
Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results
of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending. This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of
his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still
ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. attorney general,
Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter.
LET OTHER FOLKS KNOW THIS NEWS, THE MEDIA WON'T !
Subject: Issue of Passport?
While I've little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue
Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: What passport did he use when he was shuttling between
New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?
So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?
And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?
The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.
Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A: Yes, by his own admission.
Q: What passport did he travel under?
A: There are only three possibilities.
1) He traveled with a U.S.. Passport,
2) He traveled with a British passport, or
3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No.. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in1981.
Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.
If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he
relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior
to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.
Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "naturalborn" American citizen between 1981 and 2008..
Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress,the sooner we
learn the truth of all this, the better. What is the truth?
AP- WASHINGTON D.C. - In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency,the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has Released copies
of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental College . Released
today, the transcript school indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro,
received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate.
The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court
order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California.
The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify,
for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.
This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record
of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news
has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt
about Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as President article titled,
"Obama Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may
overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U.K. In a
related matter, under growing pressure from several groups,
Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo
Donofrio of New Jersey . This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship
disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio's case is just one of 18
suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship or
qualification to serve as president.
Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results
of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending. This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of
his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still
ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. attorney general,
Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter.
LET OTHER FOLKS KNOW THIS NEWS, THE MEDIA WON'T !
Subject: Issue of Passport?
While I've little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue
Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: What passport did he use when he was shuttling between
New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?
So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?
And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?
The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.
Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A: Yes, by his own admission.
Q: What passport did he travel under?
A: There are only three possibilities.
1) He traveled with a U.S.. Passport,
2) He traveled with a British passport, or
3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No.. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in1981.
Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.
If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he
relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior
to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.
Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "naturalborn" American citizen between 1981 and 2008..
Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress,the sooner we
learn the truth of all this, the better. What is the truth?
Joy Behar and Bill Maher
When you get two malcontents together don't be surprised when the hate spills out at a rapid pace. Yesterday these two morons thought it was humorous to laugh about Dick Cheney and his recent heart attack. Pity they can't see how ignorant that look.
Ms Behar needs major surgery for her attitude and Maher certainly could use a face and brain transplant. Both feel they are superior, pity the rest of us don't think they are special.
Ms Behar needs major surgery for her attitude and Maher certainly could use a face and brain transplant. Both feel they are superior, pity the rest of us don't think they are special.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Mi Rep. Thaddeus McCotter
This young man is a rising star in the Republican party and continues to thrill those who are fortunate enough to hear him speak. I don't know when he hit the scene, but he is leaving his mark along the way.
At a recent speech at CPAC, McCotter left the crowd awed with his ability at the podium. Where were the teleprompters that are required at the President's appearances?McCotter captured the audience with his charm, humor and genuine appeal.
Telling the truth to a crowd of angry citizens who are fed up with the bumbling government currently in power. He was a nice breath of fresh air.
Now that is what I call HOPE AND CHANGE!
At a recent speech at CPAC, McCotter left the crowd awed with his ability at the podium. Where were the teleprompters that are required at the President's appearances?McCotter captured the audience with his charm, humor and genuine appeal.
Telling the truth to a crowd of angry citizens who are fed up with the bumbling government currently in power. He was a nice breath of fresh air.
Now that is what I call HOPE AND CHANGE!
VP Cheney
Best wishes for a full and speedy recovery to VP Cheney who was taken to the hospital yesterday with chest pains. The VP who has a history of heart problems is being given tests.
Get well Mr. Vice President. We need your sound reasoning, strength and voice. You give all of us encouragement and we need you.
Get well Mr. Vice President. We need your sound reasoning, strength and voice. You give all of us encouragement and we need you.
Harry Reid
Once again the leader of the Senate put his foot in his mouth.It is his theory that men who are out of work tend to abuse their wives.
When he loses his seat in the Senate this fall does that mean that Mrs. Reid is in for a beating? Should we warn her?
When he loses his seat in the Senate this fall does that mean that Mrs. Reid is in for a beating? Should we warn her?
Joannie Rochette
With heartfelt sympathy our thoughts go out to Joannie Rochette who lost her mother due top a massive heart attack this week, while her daughter was practicing for her olympic ice skating event. This brave young girl has decided to continue her performance in honor of her mother, who was her greatest fan. God bless you Joannie.You will be in the thoughts and prayers of many people who were so touched by your loss.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Very powerful comment
Subject: Should Christians support Obama?
Dr. David Barton is more of a historian than a Biblical speaker, but very famous for his knowledge of historical facts as well as Biblical truths.
Dr. David Barton - on Obama
Respect the Office? Yes.
Respect the Man in the Office? No, I am sorry to say.
I have noted that many elected officials, both Democrats and Republicans, called upon America to unite behind Obama.
Well, I want to make it clear to all who will listen that I AM NOT uniting behind Obama !
I will respect the Office which he holds, and I will acknowledge his abilities as an orator and wordsmith and pray for him, BUT that is it.
I have begun today to see what I can do to make sure that he is a one-term President !
Why am I doing this ?
It is because:
- I do not share Obama's vision or value system for America;
- I do not share his Abortion beliefs;
- I do not share his radical Marxist's concept of re-distributing wealth;
- I do not share his stated views on raising taxes on those who make $150,000+ (the ceiling has been changed three times since August);
- I do not share his view that America is Arrogant;
- I do not share his view that America is not a Christian Nation;
- I do not share his view that the military should be reduced by 25%;
- I do not share his view of amnesty and giving more to illegals than our American Citizens who need help;
- I do not share his views on homosexuality and his definition of marriage;
- I do not share his views that Radical Islam is our friend and Israel is our enemy who should give up any land;
- I do not share his spiritual beliefs (at least the ones he has made public);
- I do not share his beliefs on how to re-work the healthcare system in America ;
- I do not share his Strategic views of the Middle East ; and
- I certainly do not share his plan to sit down with terrorist regimes such as Iran.
Bottom line: my America is vastly different from Obama's, and I have a higher obligation to my Country and my GOD to do what is Right! For eight (8) years, the Liberals in our Society, led by numerous entertainers who would have no platform and no real credibility but for their celebrity status, have attacked President Bush, his family, and his spiritual beliefs !
They have not moved toward the center in their beliefs and their philosophies, and they never came together nor compromised their personal beliefs for the betterment of our Country !
They have portrayed my America as a land where everything is tolerated except being intolerant !
They have been a vocal and irreverent minority for years !
They have mocked and attacked the very core values so important to the founding and growth of our Country !
They have made every effort to remove the name of GOD or Jesus Christ from our Society !
They have challenged capital punishment, the right to bear firearms, and the most basic principles of our criminal code !
They have attacked one of the most fundamental of all Freedoms, the right of free speech !
Unite behind Obama? Never ! ! !
I am sure many of you who read this think that I am going overboard, but I refuse to retreat one more inch in favor of those whom I believe are the embodiment of Evil!
PRESIDENT BUSH made many mistakes during his Presidency, and I am not sure how history will judge him. However, I believe that he weighed his decisions in light of the long established Judeo-Christian principles of our Founding Fathers!!!
Majority rules in America , and I will honor the concept; however, I will fight with all of my power to be a voice in opposition to Obama and his "goals for America ." I am going to be a thorn in the side of those who, if left unchecked, will destroy our Country ! ! Any more compromise is more defeat!
I pray that the results of this election will wake up many who have sat on the sidelines and allowed the Socialist-Marxist anti-GOD crowd to slowly change so much of what has been good in America!
"Error of Opinion may be tolerated where Reason is left free to combat it." - Thomas Jefferson
GOD bless you and GOD bless our Country ! ! !
(Please, please, please, pass this on if you agree.)
Thanks for your time, be safe. "In GOD We Trust"
"If we ever forget that we're one nation under GOD, then we will be a nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan
Dr. David Barton is more of a historian than a Biblical speaker, but very famous for his knowledge of historical facts as well as Biblical truths.
Dr. David Barton - on Obama
Respect the Office? Yes.
Respect the Man in the Office? No, I am sorry to say.
I have noted that many elected officials, both Democrats and Republicans, called upon America to unite behind Obama.
Well, I want to make it clear to all who will listen that I AM NOT uniting behind Obama !
I will respect the Office which he holds, and I will acknowledge his abilities as an orator and wordsmith and pray for him, BUT that is it.
I have begun today to see what I can do to make sure that he is a one-term President !
Why am I doing this ?
It is because:
- I do not share Obama's vision or value system for America;
- I do not share his Abortion beliefs;
- I do not share his radical Marxist's concept of re-distributing wealth;
- I do not share his stated views on raising taxes on those who make $150,000+ (the ceiling has been changed three times since August);
- I do not share his view that America is Arrogant;
- I do not share his view that America is not a Christian Nation;
- I do not share his view that the military should be reduced by 25%;
- I do not share his view of amnesty and giving more to illegals than our American Citizens who need help;
- I do not share his views on homosexuality and his definition of marriage;
- I do not share his views that Radical Islam is our friend and Israel is our enemy who should give up any land;
- I do not share his spiritual beliefs (at least the ones he has made public);
- I do not share his beliefs on how to re-work the healthcare system in America ;
- I do not share his Strategic views of the Middle East ; and
- I certainly do not share his plan to sit down with terrorist regimes such as Iran.
Bottom line: my America is vastly different from Obama's, and I have a higher obligation to my Country and my GOD to do what is Right! For eight (8) years, the Liberals in our Society, led by numerous entertainers who would have no platform and no real credibility but for their celebrity status, have attacked President Bush, his family, and his spiritual beliefs !
They have not moved toward the center in their beliefs and their philosophies, and they never came together nor compromised their personal beliefs for the betterment of our Country !
They have portrayed my America as a land where everything is tolerated except being intolerant !
They have been a vocal and irreverent minority for years !
They have mocked and attacked the very core values so important to the founding and growth of our Country !
They have made every effort to remove the name of GOD or Jesus Christ from our Society !
They have challenged capital punishment, the right to bear firearms, and the most basic principles of our criminal code !
They have attacked one of the most fundamental of all Freedoms, the right of free speech !
Unite behind Obama? Never ! ! !
I am sure many of you who read this think that I am going overboard, but I refuse to retreat one more inch in favor of those whom I believe are the embodiment of Evil!
PRESIDENT BUSH made many mistakes during his Presidency, and I am not sure how history will judge him. However, I believe that he weighed his decisions in light of the long established Judeo-Christian principles of our Founding Fathers!!!
Majority rules in America , and I will honor the concept; however, I will fight with all of my power to be a voice in opposition to Obama and his "goals for America ." I am going to be a thorn in the side of those who, if left unchecked, will destroy our Country ! ! Any more compromise is more defeat!
I pray that the results of this election will wake up many who have sat on the sidelines and allowed the Socialist-Marxist anti-GOD crowd to slowly change so much of what has been good in America!
"Error of Opinion may be tolerated where Reason is left free to combat it." - Thomas Jefferson
GOD bless you and GOD bless our Country ! ! !
(Please, please, please, pass this on if you agree.)
Thanks for your time, be safe. "In GOD We Trust"
"If we ever forget that we're one nation under GOD, then we will be a nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan
Tiger's mea culpa
Tiger's mea culpa was mearly his way of saying he is coming back to golf.He was trying to smooth the edges with his sponsors for his re-entry. Having done that, he owed a huge public apology to his wife for the public humiliation he caused her. However, there was someone who felt she was entitled to a special apology.
At nearly the same time, Gloria Allred, Ca. attorney holds a press conference for one of Tiger's many mistresses, Victoria, a porn star. Ms. Allred is demanding an apology on behalf of her client. For reasons known only to Ms. Allred, she feels this woman should have been given special consideration because she thought she was the only woman Tiger was having an affair with and that Tiger had said he loved her.Get real, lady. The man wanted to jump in bed with her. That is what they do. They say they love you.
Should she be given a special apology.....? Is she the only person on the planet that didn't know Tiger was married? When you go to bed with a married man, don't cry foul when you don't get mentioned in the mea culpa.None of the many, many woman were named, so why would she think she was something special? She was just one of many who got used by this man whore.
So go back to la la land Ms. Allred. You don't have a law suit here. Or were you just setting her up for a book deal? There could be as many as 15 "tell all" books about Tiger coming out. Afterall.....he was a very busy man whore.
At nearly the same time, Gloria Allred, Ca. attorney holds a press conference for one of Tiger's many mistresses, Victoria, a porn star. Ms. Allred is demanding an apology on behalf of her client. For reasons known only to Ms. Allred, she feels this woman should have been given special consideration because she thought she was the only woman Tiger was having an affair with and that Tiger had said he loved her.Get real, lady. The man wanted to jump in bed with her. That is what they do. They say they love you.
Should she be given a special apology.....? Is she the only person on the planet that didn't know Tiger was married? When you go to bed with a married man, don't cry foul when you don't get mentioned in the mea culpa.None of the many, many woman were named, so why would she think she was something special? She was just one of many who got used by this man whore.
So go back to la la land Ms. Allred. You don't have a law suit here. Or were you just setting her up for a book deal? There could be as many as 15 "tell all" books about Tiger coming out. Afterall.....he was a very busy man whore.
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Alert!
Gonorrhea Lectim The Center for Disease Control has issued a warning about a new virulent strain of this old disease. Very important information has just been made public of which we should all be aware: The disease is called Gonorrhea Lectim. It's pronounced "Gonna re-elect 'im." The disease is contracted through dangerous and high risk behavior involving putting your cranium up your rectum. Many victims contracted it in 2008, but now most people, after having been infected for the past 1 - 2 years, are starting to realize how destructive this sickness is. It's sad because it is so easily cured with a new procedure just coming on the market called Vo-tem-out!You take the first dose in 2010 and the second dose in 2012 and simply don't engage in such behavior again, otherwise it could become permanent and eventually wipe out all life as we know it.Several states are already on top of this like Virginia, New Jersey, and now Massachusetts, with many more seeing the writing on the wall.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Rosie and Janeane
These two pitiful has been hags were on a full rant about why anyone would watch Rush Limbaugh. Do these two angry liberals think they have something to say that anyone would want to hear?
They both come across as always angry and seem to hate the whole world. Maybe it is because they long for attention, but the best they can achieve is 3rd rate status, with hardly enough talent to get the job done.Would anyone ever consider them STAR material?
Rosie had a successful show until she shot herself in the foot and managed to lose it.Just constantly picking a fight with someone, isn't the way to wins friends and influence people.Then she tried to look as if she had a real thought that had merit while she was on the View. She just came across as a bag of wind who didn't know fact from fiction.Lost that gig too.
Janeane, I still haven't figured out. I'm not too sure she is living on the same planet as the rest of us. She seems to be out there too far,and her ramblings are just idiotic.She certainly has not made it to the top of the charts either.
Who listens to these two besides malcontents other angry liberal lesbians? Whatever happened in their past to make them so angry and have such a sour outlook on life and the country. Maybe they just need some happy pills.
Maybe if we just tolerate their rants they will get the attention they so badly crave and they will slowly go away. Now that is something to look forward to.
They both come across as always angry and seem to hate the whole world. Maybe it is because they long for attention, but the best they can achieve is 3rd rate status, with hardly enough talent to get the job done.Would anyone ever consider them STAR material?
Rosie had a successful show until she shot herself in the foot and managed to lose it.Just constantly picking a fight with someone, isn't the way to wins friends and influence people.Then she tried to look as if she had a real thought that had merit while she was on the View. She just came across as a bag of wind who didn't know fact from fiction.Lost that gig too.
Janeane, I still haven't figured out. I'm not too sure she is living on the same planet as the rest of us. She seems to be out there too far,and her ramblings are just idiotic.She certainly has not made it to the top of the charts either.
Who listens to these two besides malcontents other angry liberal lesbians? Whatever happened in their past to make them so angry and have such a sour outlook on life and the country. Maybe they just need some happy pills.
Maybe if we just tolerate their rants they will get the attention they so badly crave and they will slowly go away. Now that is something to look forward to.
Tiger
Well I guess Tiger had a press conference and made a declaration to the public. It was too little too late, and the only real apology belonged to his wife. I hope the rest of the public can now manage to go on with their lives. My life won't be one bit different because of his press.
My question is,however, can a tiger change their stripes?
My question is,however, can a tiger change their stripes?
Bill O Reilly
While I am usually a fan of OReilly, I have to disagree with his blowing out of proportion the comment Rush made using the term retarded. It was very clear to those who were listening to Rush that he was making a parody of how the left reacts to how the Dems treated this use of the term.
For a Harvard graduate I find it hard to believe that OReilly didn't get what Rush was talking about. Either that, or OReilly was trying to stir the pot.
In any event, the term is unkind, especially when used to make fun of those with special needs.
Last night on HBO there was a movie called Tropical Thunder in which Ben Stiler and another actor, kept repeating the word retarded, retard, stupid etc. you get the drift. This was done in an attempt to be funny, but it fell flat. It was much worse than anything Rush said, yet I have not heard one person come forth bashing this movie. How can so many people find fault only when a Conservative is involved? Hummmm!
For a Harvard graduate I find it hard to believe that OReilly didn't get what Rush was talking about. Either that, or OReilly was trying to stir the pot.
In any event, the term is unkind, especially when used to make fun of those with special needs.
Last night on HBO there was a movie called Tropical Thunder in which Ben Stiler and another actor, kept repeating the word retarded, retard, stupid etc. you get the drift. This was done in an attempt to be funny, but it fell flat. It was much worse than anything Rush said, yet I have not heard one person come forth bashing this movie. How can so many people find fault only when a Conservative is involved? Hummmm!
Toyota
Congress has their panties in a twist trying to get the head of Toyota before them to testify. What a shame they don't get the same concern about getting Barney Frank to the floor to testify about his involvement in the mortgage meltdown.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Peters "gets" it
Lt Col Ralph Peters gave the best description of Joe Biden to date.This morning on Fox and Friends, Peters said Biden is the wacky uncle who comes to dinner and everyone sits around the table rolling their eyes at his stories. Right on. He hit the nail on the head.In all fairness to Biden, I DO believe that HE BELIEVES what he is saying when he makes his nutty remarks.
While Biden seems to be a harmless little lap dog he certainly is no authority on the accuracy in his reports about the Iraq war and the Obama administrations participation in it. He accuses former VP Cheney or changing history, yet Biden has a very spotty memory of what actually happened.
This poor fool forgets that the American people can read and do retain their memories longer than just the past 8 years.The American people remember how both Obama and Biden voted no for supporting the war. Both said the serge wouldn't work and both wanted a pullback of troops. Now.......Cheney is rewriting history? Joe, Joe, Joe. You need to just find a nice chair on a warm beach and give yourself some time off.
Being in Washington for too many years has warped your sense of reality. Being around so many liberals can be hazardous to your truth factor. Somehow, these people have become experts at pulling the wool over each others eyes and they think the rest of us are that stupid too.But the American people are much better at wading through the debis you liberals leave in your wake.We stick to and stand by the truth no matter how you people try to rewrite it in the history books.
While Biden seems to be a harmless little lap dog he certainly is no authority on the accuracy in his reports about the Iraq war and the Obama administrations participation in it. He accuses former VP Cheney or changing history, yet Biden has a very spotty memory of what actually happened.
This poor fool forgets that the American people can read and do retain their memories longer than just the past 8 years.The American people remember how both Obama and Biden voted no for supporting the war. Both said the serge wouldn't work and both wanted a pullback of troops. Now.......Cheney is rewriting history? Joe, Joe, Joe. You need to just find a nice chair on a warm beach and give yourself some time off.
Being in Washington for too many years has warped your sense of reality. Being around so many liberals can be hazardous to your truth factor. Somehow, these people have become experts at pulling the wool over each others eyes and they think the rest of us are that stupid too.But the American people are much better at wading through the debis you liberals leave in your wake.We stick to and stand by the truth no matter how you people try to rewrite it in the history books.
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Snow in South Carolina
As I look out my front window and soak in the beauty of the overnight snowfall, there is a part of me that still loves the wonder of winter. You can't help but be drawn into the pure elegance of the storm aftermath.
However, hearing that there was snow in 49 of the 50 states, the first thought that runs through my mind is GLOBAL WARMING.How is this possible to continue this scam when there is snow in places that snow hasn't occurred in years?It's easy if you justify it with a liberal mind. The hotter it gets in summer, the more snow the winter will produce. Wow! Do you need an Ivy League education to come up with that amazing explanation?
Rather than a logical explanation for us ignorant people, just keep pushing this idiot idea and figure out ways to con the (ignorant) people into forking over their hard earned wages for yet another government program (like for instance Cap and Trade).Aren't we the same ignorant people who voted into office a guy whose only real talent was reading prepared speeches?Well......yes I guess if we would buy that one we probably will be dumb enough to believe global warming.
I'm still trying to figure out how a completely average former Vice President can go to bed and wake up as the foremost leading authority in the world on the weather, environment, and .....wait for it.......CARBON FOOTPRINTS. I'm having a bit more trouble swallowing that baloney.But then.....I didn't go to an Ivy League college nor do I have a Nobel prize. I wonder it Oscar Mayer got the Nobel for his baloney.
However, hearing that there was snow in 49 of the 50 states, the first thought that runs through my mind is GLOBAL WARMING.How is this possible to continue this scam when there is snow in places that snow hasn't occurred in years?It's easy if you justify it with a liberal mind. The hotter it gets in summer, the more snow the winter will produce. Wow! Do you need an Ivy League education to come up with that amazing explanation?
Rather than a logical explanation for us ignorant people, just keep pushing this idiot idea and figure out ways to con the (ignorant) people into forking over their hard earned wages for yet another government program (like for instance Cap and Trade).Aren't we the same ignorant people who voted into office a guy whose only real talent was reading prepared speeches?Well......yes I guess if we would buy that one we probably will be dumb enough to believe global warming.
I'm still trying to figure out how a completely average former Vice President can go to bed and wake up as the foremost leading authority in the world on the weather, environment, and .....wait for it.......CARBON FOOTPRINTS. I'm having a bit more trouble swallowing that baloney.But then.....I didn't go to an Ivy League college nor do I have a Nobel prize. I wonder it Oscar Mayer got the Nobel for his baloney.
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Robert Gibbs
What can you say about this gas bag? Is he chronically evil or are his shoes too tight. He just seems to delight in making fun of people yet he obviously never looks in a mirror to see what a icky little twerp he is.
Oh that was so funny with the writing on the hand. Ha, Ha! Couldn't you think of anything more humorous? You should go on Letterman. You both seem to have your panties in a wad when it comes to Sarah Palin. I think you are both scared to death that this woman would clean your clock socially, and she would probably never look twice at either one of you gooney looking punks.
Now go write that on your hand.
Oh that was so funny with the writing on the hand. Ha, Ha! Couldn't you think of anything more humorous? You should go on Letterman. You both seem to have your panties in a wad when it comes to Sarah Palin. I think you are both scared to death that this woman would clean your clock socially, and she would probably never look twice at either one of you gooney looking punks.
Now go write that on your hand.
Joe blow does it again
Biden just can't stop being a bearer of tall tales no matter how hard he tries. The amazing thing about Democrats is the ease with which they blame Bush for everything, and yet they have no problem taking credit for programs done on Bush's watch that worked out well.They are shamefully warped.
Both Obama and Biden were against the serge in Iraq. Both had negative feelings and were very vocal in their nasty remarks about the Bush administration. Now when the serge has worked, they are right there on the front line to take credit for the outcome. They also have had no problem taking full credit for the draw down of troops, yet that was designed and started on Bush's watch as well.
How easy they stand before the American people and continue to bash Bush and blame everything from hurricane Katrina to the earthquake in Haiti on Bush. Really, Obama! If you were doing the job you promised the people you would do, you would be much to busy the constantly find fault in the past administration. Just think of the gusto the next President will have picking up the wreckage of what you leave in your wake.
So be careful before you throw too many stones. You will be on the receiving end after the next election.
Both Obama and Biden were against the serge in Iraq. Both had negative feelings and were very vocal in their nasty remarks about the Bush administration. Now when the serge has worked, they are right there on the front line to take credit for the outcome. They also have had no problem taking full credit for the draw down of troops, yet that was designed and started on Bush's watch as well.
How easy they stand before the American people and continue to bash Bush and blame everything from hurricane Katrina to the earthquake in Haiti on Bush. Really, Obama! If you were doing the job you promised the people you would do, you would be much to busy the constantly find fault in the past administration. Just think of the gusto the next President will have picking up the wreckage of what you leave in your wake.
So be careful before you throw too many stones. You will be on the receiving end after the next election.
current administration
When you get an inexperienced,arrogant, unprepared President, advisors with little or no experience, nobody on staff with working knowledge of economics or business principals,dubious moral values,a boat load of Czars (job descriptions still unknown) and a weak cabinet, you have the formula for a disaster.Surrounding oneself with out of control ideologues only makes the situation worse.
The head of Home Land Security who can't say the word terrorist, a whimpy wisecracking doofus Spokesman,a foul mouthed confidant and a pushy control freak as "head boss" and you have the perfect storm.
Sadly, America is suffering at the hands of the Obama clan. Big promises on the campaign trail with no results once elected. What a huge disappointment to all those who thought he was the chosen one. He ended up being a big bag of hot air. Read all the teleprompters you want, if you can't or won't deliver what you said you would, it doesn't matter how well you talked the talk, when you can't or won't walk the walk.
So rally Conservatives. Support your values and campaign for solid candidates who will help us take America back. It's being ripped right out of our hands by a party of progressives who simply don't care what the end results will be. They certainly aren't working for the people as they are more than welling to show.
The head of Home Land Security who can't say the word terrorist, a whimpy wisecracking doofus Spokesman,a foul mouthed confidant and a pushy control freak as "head boss" and you have the perfect storm.
Sadly, America is suffering at the hands of the Obama clan. Big promises on the campaign trail with no results once elected. What a huge disappointment to all those who thought he was the chosen one. He ended up being a big bag of hot air. Read all the teleprompters you want, if you can't or won't deliver what you said you would, it doesn't matter how well you talked the talk, when you can't or won't walk the walk.
So rally Conservatives. Support your values and campaign for solid candidates who will help us take America back. It's being ripped right out of our hands by a party of progressives who simply don't care what the end results will be. They certainly aren't working for the people as they are more than welling to show.
Monday, February 1, 2010
Jet setter Pelosi
It was very enlightening today listening to Rush Limbaugh.The Freedom of Information Act released the travel expenses that Pelosi has racked up since becoming Speaker. Not only does she request a full size Air Force jet (no small corporate jet for this babe), but she uses the planes for her in-laws, children, their spouses and her grandchildren.To top this off, frequently she is not on the plane that her children/spouses/friends are using.
Over the course of 2 years she has run up bills for over $2 million with an additional $100,000.00 plus for food and adult beverages.She argues that she is allowed this expenditure.
What are the chances of this being brought before the Ethics committee? Unlikely since she controls what occurs on the floor of the house. If Nancy doesn't want to hear about it, it never hits the floor.Just like nothing has been done about Jack Murtha, Charlie Rangel, Barney Frank and numerous others who have scandal out the eyes,yet go unpunished. If Nancy doesn't want it.........nothing hits the floor.
It is high time to get this diva out of office.The nitwits in San Fransisco will continue to vote for this nimrod but we need to vote enough Conservatives into office to take the speakership away from her. The only other way to rid of ourselves of this demon is to wear garlic around our necks.
Over the course of 2 years she has run up bills for over $2 million with an additional $100,000.00 plus for food and adult beverages.She argues that she is allowed this expenditure.
What are the chances of this being brought before the Ethics committee? Unlikely since she controls what occurs on the floor of the house. If Nancy doesn't want to hear about it, it never hits the floor.Just like nothing has been done about Jack Murtha, Charlie Rangel, Barney Frank and numerous others who have scandal out the eyes,yet go unpunished. If Nancy doesn't want it.........nothing hits the floor.
It is high time to get this diva out of office.The nitwits in San Fransisco will continue to vote for this nimrod but we need to vote enough Conservatives into office to take the speakership away from her. The only other way to rid of ourselves of this demon is to wear garlic around our necks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)